| | Single Balloon Enteroscopy: Is It Feasible?Endoscopic surgery for the small intestine has attracted much attention in gastroenterology. We developed a novel type of enteroscopic technique, single balloon enteroscopy (SBE), for the examination of the small intestine. The SBE system consists of a dedicated endoscope, a sliding tube with a balloon, and an air controller to inflate or deflate the balloon of the overtube. During insertion of the sliding tube, the hook shape of the scope tip, which has an up/down angle instead of having the inflated balloon on the scope tip as in traditional double balloon enteroscopy (DBE), can hold the small intestine in the desired position. Otherwise, the insertion technique for SBE is the same as for DBE. Herein we present the technique and outcomes of SBE. Currently, two endoscopic modalities are used to investigate the small intestine. Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been used mainly as a screening tool for evaluating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.1 However, CE also has several disadvantages, such as inadequate manipulation in the lumen, the inability to take tissue samples, and the inability to treat intestinal strictures.2, 3 Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and its insertion technique were first published by Yamamoto and coworkers in 2001.4 Although DBE is more invasive than CE, DBE is clinically a very useful tool not only for diagnosis, but also for endoscopic therapy in the small intestine.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Although the method for DBE insertion has already been established, there are a few problems in terms of preparation and insertion for DBE as compared with conventional endoscopies. For example, during preparation, attaching the balloon with a rubber band to the tip of the endoscope is always necessary. During examination, the endoscopist must also handle two kinds of balloon systems for efficient insertion. Recently, we developed a novel single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) system and its insertion technique for examination of the small intestine. The SBE system consists of a dedicated endoscope without a balloon, a sliding tube with a balloon, and an air controller to inflate or deflate the balloon of the overtube. This study was designed to evaluate whether SBE is feasible and useful for examination of the small intestine. Technique  Equipment The dedicated SIF Q260 enteroscope (Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) has a high-resolution CCD (Q image; Olympus), a 200-cm working length, a 9.2-mm outer diameter, and a 2.8-mm working channel (Fig. 1). The flexible silicon sliding tube (ST-SB1; Olympus) is 140 cm in length, and has an 11.0-mm inner diameter and 13.2-mm outer diameter with a soft balloon at the tip of the tube. A pressure-controlled pump system (OBCU; Olympus, pressure setting range: −6.0 to + 6.0 KPa) controls balloon inflation/deflation through a narrow tube implanted into the wall of the sliding tube. The SIF-Q260, like most endoscopes from Olympus, is usually attached to an Olympus EVIS 240, 260, and SL systems, which are regular video processors. Furthermore, this scope can be combined with a Narrow Band Image (NBI) system that may expand its diagnostic value.8 Fluoroscopy should be used when the sliding tube is inserted and the small intestine is shortened, or when insertion of the endoscope is difficult due to loop formation, intestinal adhesions, etc. Indications The indications for SBE examination included all patients who were evaluated for small-bowel pathology, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The patients were investigated for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn’s disease, chronic abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and suspected small-bowel tumors. All of the patients had undergone at least one EGD or colonoscopy. Preparation and Sedation After an overnight fast, the patients underwent small-bowel cleansing at least 4 hours before the procedure with a polyethylene glycol lavage solution (Niflec; Ajinomoto Pharma Co., Tokyo, Japan) for retrograde examination. In the endoscopy room, all patients received the appropriate cardiorespiratory monitoring (continuous electrocardiogram, heart rate, oxygen saturation monitor, and intermittent blood pressure measurement), and were given propofol (3 mg/kg) and pentazosine hydrochloride (15 mg) for conscious sedation. SBE Insertion Method The insertion method for SBE is similar to that for DBE. The main difference between SBE and DBE is the method of holding the small intestine using the endoscope during insertion of the sliding tube (Fig. 2). After the endoscope is inserted maximally, the tip of the endoscope is bent 180° through its maximal up-angle or down-angle. Using this hook shape of the scope instead of the inflated balloon on the tip in DBE, the endoscope can hold the small intestine in the same position, and then the sliding tube can be inserted further without stretching the intestine. When the tip of the sliding tube arrives at the bent hook, the balloon is then inflated to grip the intestine. After returning the tip of the endoscope to the neutral position to avoid mucosal injury, both the scope and the sliding tube are simultaneously withdrawn, thus shortening the intestine. By repeating these maneuvers, the endoscope can be inserted further into the deep intestine. Endoscopist and Assistant The endoscopist who manipulates the SBE requires sufficient skill to perform a colonoscopy by the one-man method. In addition to the endoscopist, another doctor assists by inserting the sliding tube, and one physician administers the conscious sedation. Route Selection and Patient Position Except for those cases where the route was specifically selected, all patients received SBE from both routes. Typically, SBE from the oral approach was selected first, and then the examination from the anal route was performed on the same day as soon as the patient recovered from the first sedation. During the SBE examination, the patient was placed in the prone position for the oral route to avoid aspiration pneumonia. For the anal route, the patient was placed in a left lateral decubitus position during recto-sigmoid insertion, and then switched to a supine position after the sigmoid-descending junction was passed. Concrete Insertion Before passing the scope through the sliding tube, 10 mL of water is injected into the sliding tube. Since the inner lumen of the sliding tube is treated with a hydrophilic coating, the endoscope can move smoothly in the sliding tube after moistening. For the oral route, the scope is inserted into the stomach initially. Next, the sliding tube is inserted into the stomach. The scope is inserted further and should reach deeper than the second portion of the duodenum. After stretching the region from the second portion of duodenum to the stomach, the sliding tube is passed through the pylorus ring. Fluoroscopy is a valuable aid during this maneuver. It is recommended that the balloon be positioned over the papillae of Vater at first inflation to avoid acute pancreatitis.9 After the sliding tube passes Treitz’s ligament, the endoscopist may repeat the shortening procedure to the limit of insertion. In the small intestine, the shape of the scope causes a clockwise or anticlockwise torque that depends on the patient’s proportions. For the anal route, the scope is so flexible that insertion from the anal to ileocecal valve is more difficult than in conventional colonoscopy. The operators should use fluoroscopy properly and use care with the balloon in the colon to prevent the colon from being twisted. After passing the ileocecal valve, the procedure is the same as for the oral route from the small intestine. We defined the deep small intestine as the point when the proximal end of the sliding tube was inserted maximally. During oral insertion, we placed a clip at the deepest point and judged the total enteroscopy to be complete when the clip could be observed by anal insertion. Recently, we developed a novel SBE system and its insertion technique for examination of the small intestine. Outcomes  We have performed 80 SBE procedures (39 using the oral route and 41 using the anal route) on 41 patients during an 18-month period (January 2006 to July 2007). The clinical characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1. The reasons for the SBE examination were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 12), Crohn’s disease (n = 16), chronic abdominal pain (n = 5), chronic diarrhea (n = 3), and suspected small-bowel tumors (n = 5). The mean procedure time for the oral route was 62.3 minutes (range 39 to 118 minutes). The mean number of shortening procedures was 9.2 (range 3 to 16). Observation of the deep small intestine by the oral route was possible in 27 of 39 procedures. The deep small intestine could not be observed during the other 12 procedures due to intestinal adhesions (n = 6), intestinal strictures due to Crohn’s lesions (n = 4), and intestinal tumors (n = 2). The mean procedure time for the anal route was 70.2 minutes (range 35 to 118 minutes). The mean number of shortenings was 8.3 (range 0 to 19). Observation of the deep small intestine by the anal route was possible in 16 of 41 procedures. The deep small intestine could not be observed during the other 25 procedures due to intestinal adhesions (n = 16) and intestinal strictures due to Crohn’s lesions (n = 9). Overall, we could observe the entire small intestine in 6 of 21 patients (29%) who did not have Crohn’s lesions and small intestinal tumors. However, the rate of complete enteroscopy was 46% (6/13) among the 13 patients who did not have any intestinal adhesions or stenosis. Diagnosis and Treatment  All of the Crohn’s patients (n = 16) demonstrated ulcers or scar lesions in the ileocecal region. Among the 12 patients with suspected mid-gastrointestinal bleeding, new diagnoses following SBE were made in 4 patients (1 jejunal adenocarcinoma, 1 NSAID enteropathy, and 2 angiodysplasia). There were no endoscopic findings among 5 patients with chronic abdominal pain and 3 with chronic diarrhea. In the 5 patients with abdominal tumors, 3 patients with intestinal lymphomas were diagnosed by biopsy specimens taken by SBE. Endoscopic therapies using SBE were performed in 6 patients with Crohn’s disease. A total of 15 lesions caused by intestinal stricture were dilated using the CRE balloon system (USA, 12-16.5 mm, 2 minutes). The 2 patients with angiodysplasia received endoscopic hemostasis with a heat probe. Complications  The SBE procedure was safely completed in 38 patients. Of the first 10 cases that were performed using the oral route in the supine position, 1 patient with Crohn’s disease complained of chills, and had a 38.5°C body temperature on the night after receiving SBE. Although aspiration pneumonia was suspected, there were no abnormal findings on chest radiograph, and the body temperature normalized on the next day. After this patient’s experience, all of the subsequent patients received SBE using the oral route in the prone position. One patient with Crohn’s disease had a complication during anal route insertion when the tip of the scope pressed against a longitudinal ulcer scar during the insertion of the overtube, creating a mucosal tear. The tear was closed with 4 clips. The patient recovered after antibiotics administration for 2 days without food. The Crohn’s patient who received balloon dilation (16.5 mm, 3 minutes) for a stricture of the ileocecal valve complained of severe abdominal pain and had a 39.5°C body temperature after the SBE procedure. An abdominal CT revealed transmural wall thickening at the terminal ileum and localized ascites. With a diagnosis of localized peritonitis, the patient recovered after a 2-week course of antibiotics. Conclusions  Is SBE Feasible? With respect to the feasibility of SBE, which is the primary question, the rate of complete enteroscopy was only 29% (6/21). It has been reported that complete enteroscopy was achieved with DBE in 50% to 86% of those patients without adhesions or prior surgery.10, 11, 12 Although we continue to improve our skill in using SBE, the balloon on the DBE scope may be more helpful than the hook shape of the SBE scope, especially deep in the intestine or when it is twisted. A comparative study between SBE and DBE is necessary to evaluate whether the ease of insertion and the ability to inspect the small bowel are comparable. With respect to safety during insertion, we experienced a mucosal tear at a longitudinal ulcer scar caused by the tip of the scope in one patient with Crohn’s disease. The operator should pay close attention when using the hook tip of the endoscope near adhesions or narrowings of the small intestine. We conclude that an enteroscope with even a single balloon can safely and effectively inspect the deep small intestine. Therefore, SBE is a feasible diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the small intestine in addition to DBE. References  1. 1Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature. 2000;405:417. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
2. 2Delvaux M, Fassler I, Gay G. Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule as the initial intestinal investigation in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: validation of a diagnostic strategy based on the patient outcome after 12 months. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1067–1073.
CrossRef
3. 3Ell C, May A. Capsule status 2004: what is the outcome in bleeding? (Are there really additional indications?). Endoscopy. 2004;36:1107–1108.
CrossRef
4. 4Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:216–220. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (174 KB)
|
CrossRef
5. 5May A, Nachbar L, Pohl J, et al. Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double balloon enteroscopy:feasibility and limitations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:527–535. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
6. 6Kita H, Yamamoto H, Yano T, et al. Double balloon endoscopy in two hundred fifty cases for the diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal disorders. Inflammopharmacology. 2007;15:74–77. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
7. 7Mönkemüller K, Fry LC, Ebert M, et al. Feasibility of double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted chromoendoscopy of the small bowel in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy. 2007;39:52–57.
CrossRef
8. 8Heine GD, Hadithi M, Groenen MJ, et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Endoscopy. 2006;38:42–48.
CrossRef
9. 9Zhong J, Ma T, Zhang C, et al. A retrospective study of the application on double-balloon enteroscopy in 378 patients with suspected small-bowel diseases. Endoscopy. 2007;39:208–215.
CrossRef
10. 10Sun B, Shen R, Cheng S, et al. The role of double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosis and management of incomplete small-bowel obstruction. Endoscopy. 2007;39:511–515.
CrossRef
11. 11Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1094–1098.
CrossRef
12. 12Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:1010–1016. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (248 KB)
|
CrossRef
13. 13May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:62–70. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (232 KB)
|
CrossRef
14. 14Mönkemüller K, Weigt J, Treiber G, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of double-balloon enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2006;38:67–72.
CrossRef
15. 15Kaffes AJ, Koo JH, Meredith C. Double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and the management of small-bowel diseases: an initial experience in 40 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:81–86. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (154 KB)
|
CrossRef
⁎ Division of Gastroenterology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan. † Department of Endoscopy, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan. Address reprint requests to Tomoyuki Tsujikawa, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa-cho, Seta, Otsu, Shiga, Japan 520-2192.
PII: S1096-2883(08)00004-1 doi:10.1016/j.tgie.2008.01.003 © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|